One of the aphorisms of the Zen of Python says:

> Explicit is better than implicit.

[Go dehl writes this code to solve FizzBuzz](http://paddy3118.blogspot.com/2023/05/pythons-chained-conditional-expression.html):


```python
for i in range(1, 101):
    print('FB' if not i % 15 else 'F' if not i % 3 else 'B' if not i % 5 else i)
```

Read that expression out loud: “the string 'FB' If not i modulus 15; else 'F' if no i modulus 3; else 'B' if not i
modulus 5; else i”. It sounds exactly like the opposite of the solution! Why? Because Go dehl is (ab)using the fact that
`0` is false-y. A number a is a multiple of another number b if `a % b` is 0, and `0` evaluates to `False` in boolean
context[^1], so he's negating that instead of writing `if i % 15 == 0` . It's a tendency that I also see in other
languages where they write `a && b` instead of `if a: b`. Sometimes we get used to these shorthands, but in this case,
to me, it was completely confusing. So, please, “Explicit is better than implicit”.

I would have written this as a comment on their blog, but it only works if I login with a Google account, which I don't
have; hence, this post.

[^1]: See [my previous take on this](https://www.grulic.org.ar/~mdione/glob/posts/the-truth-about-bool-in-Python/)